1Password add-on is now two versions old on Firefox and hasn’t been updated since the beginning of February. Why is nothing happening on this?
1 Like
Hi Mozilla,
We have same problem here: our extension (Wanteeed) was submitted on April 13th and we have no feedback for the review. We don’t know how to facilitate the work of the review team.
Meanwhile we have delivered 2 other new versions on Chrome store.
Can you give us any feedback ?
hi, is there a problem with the review process? my unlisted add-on which normally only takes 10-15 minutes to pass review, has now been in the review queue for 3 days. very little has changed since the last release, so something is not right here, i see there are also many other people complaining of unusual delays in the approval system, is it a bug in the approvals/review system or just a lack of manpower to look through the automated reports?
1 Like
Well i received an email from mozilla saying they have changed their review policy with regards to extensions with significantly large numbers of users, they say they are going to manually review all updates for the most popular extensions from now on.
oh great, lets step back to the medieval ages, when everyone else is living in the ever accelerating AI age…
They say this change may result in “minor delays”, but come on, the exact same extension and exact same code submitted to the chrome webstore gets approved immediately, (the only difference being i updated the chrome version to MV3) I would consider a minor delay 10 or 15minutes, not 3 or 4 days… The other thing is the chrome version has over 100 times more users than the firefox version of the extension. So how come google can review and approve minor extension updates instantaneously but firefox must take 4-5 days…?
The full text of their email is below for anyone who is interested:
Hello Firefox extension developers,
We wanted to make you aware of a recent change to AMO’s review process, as it may impact new submissions of your extension. All extension submissions with a significantly large number of users are now subject to human review by the add-ons review team before approval. This may, occasionally, result in minor delays publishing new versions of your extension on AMO. We’ve made this change to provide Firefox users with even greater security assurances for some of AMO’s most popular extensions, such as yours.
As always, we greatly appreciate your contributions to the Firefox extension ecosystem. Cheers!
Firefox Add-ons staff
Continuing the discussion from Add-on Review Questions:
I just have to ask:
Why on earth are they going with the manual approach? This doesn’t make any sense at all.
I’ve been waiting for the latest update to Return YouTube Dislikes to be approved, and they take AGES to approve it. It’s pretty frustrating…
1 Like
Hi Mozilla, are there any chances to speed up the review process for our unlisted plugin or is there at least a rough estimate by when it will be completed? The previous version has been disabled due to security issues. Unfortunately, we’ve missed the email notifying us about the upcoming blocklisting if we don’t fix them.
Edit: Got our approval approx. an hour ago. Not sure whether it has to do with my post here or not. Anyway, thanks!
2 Likes
The actual review process is too slow! I’ve submited the add-on 18 days ago and with each new interaction, it takes you at least 5 days to respond me. This has been frustrating
Please, Mozilla! Help the developers to get it fast.
Hello, @Edward_Sullivan. I’ll try to submit a beta version: Méliuz Beta: Cashback e cupons.
Now I recieve this message: “Automatic rejection after grace period ended.”.
Very frustrating to have to submit everything again and I will probably have the same problems with the next reviewer.
No, It isn’t. This is a public version of the addon. The Méliuz Beta: Cashback e cupons addon is the invisible version of that.
We separated the beta so that we could carry out internal testing before submitting the version to the public.
The approval process is super frustrating because it takes far too long to hear back from a reviewer. Our add on has now been removed, and we’re just considering keeping it permanently off if this is the norm for approval processes. Meanwhile, our Chrome variations are reviewed and approved within a few hours.
Hi,
We always used to have auto reviews, but since a week or so no longer.
The process tends to take very long and I basically have 2 versions more then are reviewed already.
Wondering if there’s any way to improve the review time/have to option for auto again?
@Chris_Bongers, there may be a few different reasons why your extension is no longer being auto-reviewed. The most common reason I’ve seen is that your extension has reached enough users that our review team needs to manually verify that releases are safe.
If you’d like additional details, you can post in the Add-on Reviewers Matrix channel. Make sure to include the ID of the extension so a reviewer can look into your specific case.
3 Likes
Hello
Please be more reasonable about approving dimden’s Oldtwitter Add-on
https://x.com/d1mden/status/1793925792499654777
https://x.com/d1mden/status/1793926342129684817
It works on chrome and I don’t want to switch to that browser 
Unfortunately that extension has a couple policy violations, including remote code execution.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
As mentioned by the addon author the current rules are far too strict, and make it impossible to “fix” that addon. The policy in question is actively shoving users off of your platform as a result. Sure, you can suffer along with Nightly or Dev builds, or unbranded, but those are bandaids to overzealous moderation
1 Like
Thank you for the feedback @Vaelophis_Nyx. Allowing remote code execution is unlikely to be a policy change we’d make.
1 Like
