# Question about CV Sentence Extractor quality and your experience

**URL:** <https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/question-about-cv-sentence-extractor-quality-and-your-experience/102911>\
**Category:** Common Voice\
**Created:** [August 17, 2022, 12:27pm UTC](https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/question-about-cv-sentence-extractor-quality-and-your-experience/102911 "2022-08-17T12:27:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mkohler](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex001/user_avatar/discourse.mozilla.org/mkohler/32/21244_2.png) [@mkohler](https://discourse.mozilla.org/u/mkohler)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2022, 8:52pm UTC](https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/question-about-cv-sentence-extractor-quality-and-your-experience/102911/18 "2022-09-15T20:52:49Z")

</div>

> [@ftyers](#):
>
> > Well, not at the current state. The WikiExtractor does not give us much information on the article, so being selective there without further implementation of additional API calls won’t be possible.
> 
> WikiExtractors (at least the ones I am familiar with that work from the `pages-articles.xml.bz2` dumps) give you access to the article title, so this should be possible.

Yes, you’re right. However to me this sounds like this could have legal implications though (we somehow would need to keep track which articles were exported and what not, at least). And probably we’d need to use IDs rather than titles to make sure we do not re-extract an article when its title changes. And I also wonder how maintainable this would be. Something or someone would still need to come up with a list of article, rather than relying on categories or similar, which I initially was thinking about (sorry!).

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/question-about-cv-sentence-extractor-quality-and-your-experience/102911)._