"Sub-specification" question for spec tables

I’m documenting new changes to WebRTC in Firefox 55, and have come upon this situation. The WebRTC statistics model is documented in a separate specification from the rest of WebRTC. Now, I want to reference that specification in the spec table, but I want to keep WebRTC related stuff all grouped together.

What I assume I should do is this:

  1. Add to SpecName.ejs the information about the WebRTC Statistics API.

  2. Add the statistics stuff to the WebRTC 1.0 group in GroupData.json.

  3. Use “WebRTC Statistics” or whatever when writing the spec table.

  4. Use “WebRTC” in the APIRef macro and such, so that the sidebar is all-inclusive.

Does that sound correct to everyone who is more involved in the new changes we’re making to these tables and all than I am? :slight_smile:

Eric Shepherd
Senior Technical Writer
Mozilla


Blog: http://www.bitstampede.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/sheppy

Sounds good to me. If makes sense to separate out the spec to a separate row on the spec table, but include it in the same sidebar.