# Test the new look of addons.mozilla.org!

**URL:** <https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/test-the-new-look-of-addons-mozilla-org/20860>\
**Category:** addons.mozilla.org\
**Created:** [October 25, 2017, 3:59pm UTC](https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/test-the-new-look-of-addons-mozilla-org/20860 "2017-10-25T15:59:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grahamperrin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex001/user_avatar/discourse.mozilla.org/grahamperrin/32/17266_2.png) [@grahamperrin](https://discourse.mozilla.org/u/grahamperrin)\
**Post date:** [October 28, 2017, 2:00pm UTC](https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/test-the-new-look-of-addons-mozilla-org/20860/13 "2017-10-28T14:00:14Z")

</div>

## Collections: no hint of incompatibilities when browsing

> [@Can I search only for WebExtensions?](https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/can-i-search-only-for-webextensions/14591/7):
>
> … popular [optimized firefox – Add-ons for Firefox (en-US)](https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/collections/davy-jones/optimizefirefox/?sort=popular) (129 extensions), which seems to be one hundred percent incompatible with WebExtensions, which is why I maintain a warped sense of humour. …

🙂 it’s now less than one hundred percent.

The new look does not yet offer any hint of incompatibility:

[![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex001/uploads/mozilla/original/3X/e/c/ec040366e55302102500dee18b256a3756775572.jpeg "A preview of how a collection of mostly incompatible add-ons might appear in Firefox 57") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl-pz3naMTI)

A key frame from that recording, where I switch to a Firefox 57 view of things:

 ![2017-10-28 14:37 frame](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex001/uploads/mozilla/original/3X/9/9/99ce16a49d4e616d78f309ee24c360fa17eef0dc.jpeg)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/test-the-new-look-of-addons-mozilla-org/20860)._