Update in review for 3+ months

Hi team,

I maintain SSP Wallet — open-source browser extension wallet. Our submission has been in review for 3+ months, and we’re ready to ship v1.39.0 with Solana support and important fixes our users
are waiting for.

Every submission we send already includes:

  • Full source code
  • Reproducible / deterministic builds — any reviewer can rebuild the exact ZIP from the public git tag
  • Reviewer notes documenting build steps, dependencies, endpoints, and permission justifications

The same builds clear Chrome Web Store and our mobile apps clear Apple/Google review within hours.

I understand AMO is fighting a flood of malicious submissions, and that work matters. So my real question is: what more can a project like ours do to land in a faster lane? If reproducible
builds + open source + reviewer notes + a clean review history isn’t enough signal, we’d genuinely like to know what is — and we’ll do it.

Is there a lighter-touch path for established, reproducibly-built, open-source extensions after N clean reviews? If not, would the team consider one? I’d happily contribute to defining the
criteria.

Thanks for the work you do.

SSP Wallet - MultiSig Crypto Wallet – Get this Extension for 🦊 Firefox (en-US)

Hi,

Thanks for reaching out and for the constructive framing.

We are currently experiencing a significant influx of daily submissions, and we are working hard on tackling them. A lot of progress has been made in the past few weeks, and we appreciate your patience as we navigate this new era.

Thanks for the work you do too.

Christos