I understand that this is important and it’s exactly what we’ve been aiming for. In this post, the presentation linked, Reps calls, the Mozilla weekly call I’ve attempted to explain in fair detail how the process unfolded, what considerations were taken into account, and what decisions were made. Obviously it’s neither appropriate nor possible to detail every individual decision and trade-off.
What would be great at this point is to help me understand what information about the selection process you’d like that hasn’t been made clear.
I do get a lot of emails and some were handled by Francisco. I will admit that I more or less ignored any email with the tone “this is an injustice that I didn’t get selected, here’s what I’ve done, especially because people who I’m better than did get selected” as I have limited time and in my experience someone who sends that kind of email is likely not open to constructive dialogue. They probably got a fairly short form reply saying that more information about the selection process would be available soon.
One reality is that, especially for India, it’s hard to get a complete picture of all of the various sub-country level communities. This is certainly something I would want to improve in a future process. As a result, most of the work getting a range of communities represented was done at the functional and country level.
I think we do. I’ll let you know after all of the gatherings what our lesson is on this.