I’m currently reviewing some sentences, and am unsure how to proceed.
Example: 台湾是中华人民共和国的神圣领土的一部分
Translation: Taiwan is part of the sacred territory of the People’s Republic of China
The text may be potentially inflammatory, but there are no rules regarding this. However, “we are trying to make recording sentences as much fun as possible”, and I’m not sure these sentences are much fun to read. 
Any advice?
Perhaps the guidelines could be updated to include a rule that they shouldn’t be political / controversial to certain groups?
I believe this is up to individual communities to decide. See e.g. here. People can always report the sentence.
I think you make a good point! It’s definitely important to cover the corpus of words that come up. Just wary of turning away contributors. Think these sentences are grammatically sound, so I’ll allow them?
Sorry, I’m still new to the contributing/reviewing sentences space. (I used to do recording/listening) I’m not aware of how to add a warning message?
where did you find the sentences? sentences collector, or on common voice website during record, or in the downloaded database?
I think it’s fine to ignore them, if the local community had no problem with it.
We had remove some Chinese Simplified sentences previously due to political sensative to local participants. If you find any sentences on Common Voice site that had similar problem, you can also report in the following thread.
If you found the sentence on Sentences Collector, you can just reject them if you feel the sentences will upset some contributor.
this could be very difficult because many sentences were came from wikipedia scraptor. If we set up such guideline, we’re basically asking contributor to do manual censoring on every single sentences.