I identify myself in various areas (l10n, SUMO), but all they have in common is I always threat them as something local. Definitely we need to align with stuff happening in global (and can influence them by participating in discussions when it’s open), but our best strength is helping Mozilla locally, making Firefox open, accessible and friendly for people in the Czech Republic.
In the Czech community, if someone can be considered as leader, it would be me. Personally I would call myself a “guide”. I am the longest one involved and probably having the most contacts and widest overview of what’s happening in Mozilla. But personally I do not consider myself as a leader, I never tell people what we should do. Sometimes I have ideas, what we can do and achieve, yes, but everyone can do what he/she wants to do and feels is the most beneficial. So my “leadership” is limited to having ideas and sharing knowledge.
So to answer the question, how to implement these principles in the Czech community - better do not. Either we have no true leadership, or if you decide co consider me as a leader, I would need to restrict my regular contributions and force someone else to take them over, even if they do not want to or won’t feel comfortable in the position. I would say if Mozilla wants to be an open project, in the first place we should have leaders open to others, accepting feedback and giving feedback.