Question about CV Sentence Extractor quality and your experience

[mkohler (Michael Kohler)]

@bozden

But generally I’m really not a fan of that approach because that means that future exports on new articles can’t be done automatically.

I think they can go through the same workflow. wiki_delta_yyyymmdd.txt like.

But that would not be automatic

@bozden

@mkohler

If it’s only removals, this should be easy to review, and might be something we could do.

So better workflow suggestion:

This can easily be an extension to SC I think… “Wiki QC” menu item… +Two people say OK, than it is OK… Exports can go automatically into it… (sorry that the suggestion means more work for you)…

Removals are easy. If the diff is all red, so all removals only, then I don’t see any legal issue at all and it doesn’t need a full review.

The problem arises with typo fixes, then every single change needs to be reviewed from a legal perspective to make sure it’s really just a typo fix.

Neither of those two would fit into the manual review flow through Sentence Collector IMHO. So, as you suggest, one solution could be to review all the extract. For that this could indeed be done through Sentence Collector, but really, I don’t think this scales well.