Hello, we had uploaded our extension 27 December 2016 and we have received an email on 28 December from reviewer that say - your extension contains binary, obfuscated or minified code. so we have uploaded new version of our extension on 3 January 2017 but we did not receive any response from reviewer.
Can you accelerate the review process and give us the answer about publication terms?
Using minified unknown code will require sources and then that would go into admin queue.
Your addon will be rejected anyway because of remote script in analytics.js
The use of eval() in app-prefix.js & rvapp.js will result in rejection.
Remote images (and other remote resources) can be used for tracking (it will be allowed if the resource is from the same domain as the page the user is on). Please include them in the addon. eg: app.js
AFA JQuery, minified version is better since it is a known library. Established libraries must be included separately, from their official source, in their original format without any modification. Your included JQuery’s hash does not match the original.
There is no need to include sources for JQuery.
The remote script/Google Analytics in background.js will result in rejection.
Tracking will require Privacy Policy.
Logging to console should be removed.
Addon’s “content_security_policy” has remote script and it will result in rejection.