Dear,
I am wondering that whether it is possible to store the files locally instead of S3? My guess is to change several places in the code. If possible, please suggest me where should I look?
Best wishes,
It’s been a while since I looked, but I think this behavior is already possible in a development environment?. " * Launch an s3proxy instance to store files locally and avoid going through setting up AWS S3." You could also look into running locally an “object storage” application that implements the s3 api. This way it would probably be enough to change the s3 config to point to your local service.
1 Like
Thank you very much. I will check this for my development.