I have a problem with your moderator team.
I have an extension (it is on the platform since October 2019 and has had no complaints from the users), which has some slightly obfuscated code (minification). All that code does is URL unhashing (to make them usable).
It is possibly breaking the copyright laws of my country, but the reason for rejection is not that thing. The reason is that the code is minified. The problem is that the code is not written by me (it’s authors are VK’s developers), so I cannot provide the source.
I provided at least 2 links on GitHub to one of your moderators with the code very similar to mine to prove that this code really does the URL unhashing for VK Audio.
But that was not accepted, I was told that if I am using a library it should be a release version and not modified. But it is not a library, and that code on GitHub is not a library too, it is part of other 2 projects (like extended VK API and some downloaders).
I know that asking to make some exception is maybe wrong, but honestly it is absurd what is going on now. I never changed that part of code since the original extension upload here (well, maybe only 1-2 times when they changed the hashing function on VK side), and now I should either remove the download audio feature or get banned completely.
What’s the point of this witch-hunting? I’m not doing anything malicious with that code. It is obvious if you read how and where it is called, at least. Also you can test my extension and its download current audio track feature directly on vk.com, I can even make an account for such test.
Here is my extension’s page: https://addons.mozilla.org/ru/firefox/addon/vk-plus-script/