I was asked in IRC about this and figured I’d check in to see what the latest thinking is on this.
Should we have a
spec_url entry in each feature and subfeature? It’s suggested that having this could be very useful, removing the need to do indirection through MDN to reach the spec if you have to get at that.
This is doubly true since we are not very consistent really about including the
mdn_url field, which I think we should make mandatory rather than optional, at least for top-level features if not for features and subfeatures both. It can have a special value of some kind (
false, perhaps) if there is no page on MDN about the subject (or possibly instead if there isn’t and isn’t expected to be).
I’m personally on the fence about the
spec_url field, but definitely think we should consider making the existing