Hi @preinheimer, thanks for reaching out. I’ll do my best to answer these questions.
What changed recently requiring more manual reviews?
We continually assess the ecosystem for threats and update our security mechanisms to identify and react to potentially malicious submissions. Sometimes when this happens, it results in more submissions being flagged for manual review.
When we see a backlog in the manual review queue, we investigate the causes of the surge and use our findings to improve the accuracy of our security mechanisms to reduce the impact to non-malicious developers. Sometimes that can take awhile to sort out.
What can developers do to avoid the manual review requirement? (knowing this may help reduce the manual review load).
We don’t have anything more specific at this time. We will share more information as it becomes available.
Are there multiple manual-review queues? How do you get into the faster manual review queue?
There are different queues depending on the category, type and properties of add-on. While some queues may naturally move a bit faster than others (e.g. we want to react to malicious add-ons quickly to protect users), they are not review-speed based and add-ons don’t move from one into the other.
Timeliness of reviews seems to be a perpetual item of concern (the sidebar populated with lots of posts going back years), does mozilla consider extensions to be an asset worth prioritizing?
Yes, this is a challenging area for us and other browser vendors! We do consider timeliness important and we aim to complete manual reviews as quickly as possible. However, other factors can contribute to delays (such as personal time off for staff, holiday schedules, etc).
I know the current delays are very frustrating for folks in the manual review queue. We apologize for the inconvenience and we’re working as quickly as possible to address the backlog.
Our application Free VPN Proxy by VeePN ver. 2.1.5 is in the review status from June 24th. What could be the reason for such a long review process? No comments from support team yet We really need the update of the app now. Can we help with something to speed it up?
We are currently experiencing a higher than usual volume of submissions. Our team is working as quickly as possible to look at add-ons that have been selected for manual review. It may take a couple of weeks for your submission to be reviewed.
Please do not resubmit your version as it will be added to the manual review queue and cause additional delays.
We’ve now been in the queue for 6 weeks, no end in sight. We often go days without even advancing in the queue at all.
At this point we’ve got another release ready to go, and one that fixes bugs and reduces the number of warnings we expect the automated tools to fire. It seems like we’ll only be able to share that with Chrome & Edge users because the advice seems to be to not upload again while stuck in this queue.
Oh and the display of the queue disappeared. Here’s the data I did get: x.com
@caitlin Can you clarify something for me please. Our addon is unlisted, but has been awaiting review for a couple of weeks (addon id = pangeo-beta@geoedge.com).
Our addon is unlisted (as it’s just the beta versions for our testers and some early adopters to use)
The previous policy for unlisted addons was to approve them automatically (ie: no manual review was required).
Has the policy changed for unlisted addons? (some now appear to require manual review)
If so, why?
I think we all appreciate that the manual review team can only do so much in a given time, so a lot of us here are using unlisted addons to push out beta versions more frequently than our stable versions of the addon. If the unlisted addons now take as much time as listed addons then we’re all in for a lot of problems.
Thanks in advance for any clarification you can give about the situation
Unlisted add-ons have always been eligible for manual review, although there’s been an increase in those selected for manual review since we introduced some security mechanisms when we moved to the post-review model a few years ago.
What is the name of your add-on? I can check to see where it’s at in the process.
We’d like to push new changes out to these addons in the coming weeks, so it would be good to know if they will need manual review each time? If so, is there anything we can change in our codebase to avoid requiring manual review (we don’t use eval or any external code).
Add-on (page) is awaiting listed version review for 2 months now. We were tracking queue position patiently but now it’s not even displayed.
Can you provide any ETA or explain how is it taking so long? I know its a common question at this time, but it feels like the add-on review is forgotten.
My extension (https://addons.mozilla.org/ru/firefox/addon/fastproxy-россия/) has been in Awaiting Review from 7 July.
Until recently, it was possible to observe progress in the check queue.
There is currently no indication of when the extension will be approved.
@caitlin Hi! My item (CensorTracker: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/censor-tracker/) is awaiting review for almost two months. Can you please help me? It was just a simple update and it’s pretty strange that the review takes this long. Thank you very much for your time and I hope we can find out what is wrong.
Hello,
I don’t understand the policy of targeting unlisted add-ons for manual review at all. I submitted an add-on published by Mozilla for testing (https://github.com/mdn/webextensions-examples/tree/master/proxy-blocker) and it has been unacceptable for many weeks. The add-on doesn’t have any malicious code that needs reviewing, because it’s your add-on?
As I removed the word “proxy” from the permission list in the manifest file, the add-on is automatically accepted within 5 minutes.
Can someone explain this situation?
We really need the update of the app now. Can we help with something to speed it up?