Hi @caitlin Oh I just see that all new addons in FF83 are âRecommendedâ. I must have been mistaken. Sorry. I ask myself if we as user can help in any way. If with each update only 100 addons are added, it takes a very long time until all (or most) of the addons are supported.
Hello, I have a very simple extension and I would like to port it to a newer version of mobile browser, how can I do that? Can you allow it to be installed?
https://addons.mozilla.org/ru/firefox/addon/nhentai-vertical-scroll-mode/
Hi @maka *
You have to use Nightly. Itâs explained here. Thereâs more discussion up-thread.
(* Did you know thereâs an add-on called MAKA: Make America Kittens Again.
I didnât write it, but I bought the author his first computer - an Atari 520ST)
With all due respect, why is that so surprising? With this development decision, you basically pulled the rug from under the core of the Firefox mobile users. The point of an add-on system is that users can arbitrarily extend the functionality of a software. Now you, or whoever made the decision, decided that this feature isnât valuable enough to keep. That not only will there be a manual approval process, but you will only approve add-ons that are popular enough for you to consider. Now people are begging on their knees to have their addons whitelisted. The previous years have been a continuous nightmare where Mozilla took away user freedom step by step and completely ignored us. Meanwhile more news cropped up that Firefox is losing market share and revenue, and its existence is in danger, and then you make this crippling decision which goes against all reason. Has no one on the board thought about how this will make users feel in this context? Of course we will make bad faith assumptions.
And while this decision is a failure, itâs not the only reason youâre getting this kind of response. Itâs also because of how you communicated it.
- You pushed a software update that enacts these breaking changes without any forewarning or user consent.
- You write a blog post where about two paragraphs touch on this subject, and open a forum thread. And thatâs all the communication that can be found. I had to search for hours to arrive here and comprehend what happened.
- You donât answer user questions, you show zero acknowledgement of the damage done, and after growing pressure, all we get is that you guys are thinking about stuff and not yet sure what you want to do.
You just broke a software and said that youâre not sure you want to unbreak it, ever. Completely left in the dark. For me personally, you broke workflows that will take weeks to restore/substitute, and some parts are irreversibly lost. How can you expect us to not speculate in this situation?
Indeed I noted that volunteersâ replying at SUMO to users who have add-on problems already are âmoderatedâ (kinda offputting, no?), while other areas of problems are not.
There is no way to notice that, however, unless you actually are going to help out a user with a reply.
I am not sure whether this is going to motivate many volunteers to put more hours into a system like that.
Meanwhile, helpful replies simply get delayed, it appeared to me.
If you think, there is a problem with moderation policy at SUMO, the discussion forum for that is here:
https://support.mozilla.org/forums/contributors
If the problem is with URLs in replies delaying the appearance of posts, that is due to the link moderation implemented in response to scammers. If you are a frequent contributor, you can be added to a group that is allowed to post links.
And if they think they have too few volunteers to help out lately, then maybe theyâd reconsider all those policies (anti-scammer or not) with or without discussion at https://support.mozilla.org/forums/contributors .
this makes perfect sense. It addresses the underlying problem commensurately.
Iâm now using Nightly on this 10" tablet. All my own addons work. It is certainly faster than Fennec
And it was stable too - up to yesterday when it was crash central, and many sites - including several Moz ones, just froze.
I wanted to reinstall an apk of an older nightly, but couldnât find them. Can someone post the location?
We really need the addon fix for beta!
Well, it is a new year, and still the stable version of âFirefox for Androidâ does not support searching for and installing âadd-onsâ or âextensionsâ. It should have been a simple fix, just add the link to the search page at the bottom of the add-ons manager tab, as they had it working before. Something like this For more add-ons click here. . Once you click on it the website should be able to show the compatible add-ons for the version of Firefox you are using, not just the â11 Recommended add-onsâ.
Over the last few months as my disappointment with the new âFirefox for Android Appâ has grown, my rating of Firefox has gone down on the Google play store. It has gone from a Five star rating to a One star rating. Thatâs because the one âBIG Thingâ that made Firefox different from Chrome was the ability to search for and find new add-ons, install them, test them, remove them if I didnât like them, complain to the developer if I found a bug, report the add-on to Mozilla if I felt it should be removed from the Firefox Add-ons web site. RIGHT NOW I CANâT DO ANY OF THAT!!!
I recently went to https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/ and tried to search for âfit to widthâ and âFennec TextWrapâ the search came back as not found! I was hoping to find out if they had been updated and compatible with the latest version of âFirefox for Androidâ, It seems that the search function on the web site will only display recommended Add-ons.
So even if I was to install the unstable nightly version and was able to do the âCollectionsâ workaround, it would fail because I could not search to find the add-ons!
This reminds me of the âLaurel and Hardyâ movies I would watch as a kid. This is another fine mess you have gotten us in too!
Firefox (up to 68.11.0) add-ons were the reason I used Firefox for Android instead of Vivaldi, which does not support extensions on mobile.
That even made me switch from Vivaldi (Iâm an ex Opera Presto user) to Firefox, so I can share my favourites between PC and mobile.
Because my whole mobile use of a browser (second hand CD shops, list of things I already own) requires a certain MusicBrainz COLLECTION HIGHLIGHTER user script that in turn requires Violentmonkey to run.
Or a browser that natively supports Greasemonkey scripts / userscripts.
Now I am still on Firefox 68.11.0 but some people say itâs not safe.
I tried Iceraven, my user scripts work there, but I donât feel confortable using a fork. Maybe itâs still safer than official Firefox 68.11.0.
Please add Violentmonkey back to the Firefox add-ons.
Weâd like to expand support and weâre still evaluating how we can do that without running into the security and compatibility problems we saw with add-ons in Fennec
Oh first time I see why add-ons support has been removed!
- What kind of security problems? Malicious add-ons? Which ones?
- What kind of compatibility problems? Broken add-ons? Itâs just the problem of add-on maintainer.
One public mention of a potential security improvement that may be missing has been in this blog post Iâve mentioned earlier in this thread:
A side remark in this recent add-ons blogpost: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/08/24/introducing-a-scalable-add-ons-blocklist/ may shed some light on the factors involved with allowing the installation of arbitrary extensions on Android:
We are currently evaluating additional optimizations in order to further minimize the size of the blocklist for use on Fenix, the next major release of Firefox for Android.
This may of course also not have been a factor in the decision.
The latest nightly I have (210310 17:03) broke my addon, and the next one seems to be delayed.
Where can I find APKs of earlier versions?
Well, I found an older one on a site called âuptodownâ but I couldnât find a proper mozilla source.
Q1 Is there a safe mozilla source for old nightlies? Iâve asked before, but got no answer.
So Iâm back on 210308 and my addons are working again. I first deleted the Gplay version, which deleted itâs profile, so I had to reload lots of stuff (eg top-sites) so the whole procedure took ages.
Itâs why having âunapprovedâ addons only in nightly is a bad idea. Why canât we have private collections on beta? Beta releases are all on github.
Gplay is now offering me an update - but doesnât tell me the new version, so it could be the same faulty one.
If this were desktop Fx I would look at bugzilla to find out whatâs going on, what fixes have been landed, whether thereâs been a regression. I canât find anything similar on github. (I use github but Iâm not very familiar with it.)
Q2 Where can I look to find out what went wrong, if anything (Gplay updates seemed to stop for two days) and what version has been pushed to Gplay?
Hello there @caitlin Oh I simply see that all new addons in FF83 are âSuggestedâ. I more likely than not been mixed up. Sorry. I inquire as to whether we as client can help in any capacity. On the off chance that with each update just 100 addons are added, it takes quite a while until all (or the vast majority) of the addons are upheld.
Whatâs actually gone wrong is this: People in Mozilla leadership are aware that the latest versions donât work and are unacceptable, but they really REALLY want to stop people from using the older, still-working versions - they donât want anyone to find out that thatâs an option.
Because if people found out there was a way to install a working version instead of the latest version, a lot of them would obviously do so. Canât have that, now, can we.
So anything they can reasonably do to make older versions disappear, theyâll do it. (That includes not answering questions that refer to the fact that newer versions are broken, or that ask how to get older versions, or even ones that ask for clarity about what the latest update actually is.)
I know thereâs a possibility that someone may deny what Iâve just written. To that person: Along with your denial, please post the Mozilla-approved publicly-accessible downgrade path enabling users to choose which version theyâll install, definitely including a link to version 68, and also including whichever others you think might be helpful. Failing that, please consider not starting the denial charade in the first place.
Hi @DaveRo, I apologize for missing replying to this. You can find older Nightly builds at https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/wiki. These builds expire every six months or so. As a quick note, Android requires you to uninstall your current Nightly before you can load an older build. (Release and Beta channels will be unaffected, if you have those channels installed.)
Iâm not sure about the best place to look for info about Play Store issues. If youâre able to do so, you can drop a message into the #fenix room on Matrix.