Procedural question: what to do when an edit is ‘questionable’. Is there a valid avenue for discussion besides filing a doc bug?
At article <input type=“checkbox”> back in July someone updated an example to a clever alternate way to do something, using CSS rather than JS. Irritatingly, they forgot to update the old text above “This is achieved with a simple block of JavaScript.”
But (and since I’m more a JS coder than CSS) I thought “well, which example is more informative, the 11 lines of painful explicit JS or the 8 lines of confusing CSS magic?”
So, what is the best forum for discussing either/or decisions, where best judgement may be a collaborative affair? At Wikipedia I might change and drop a comment on the article’s talk page, explaining the conundrum. But where here? Talk pages don’t really seem to function here?