Scrooge McDuck (Jonathan Hoefler) came and intimidated me with his lawyer. Between that and belligerent PRs (VMware, I’m looking at you), I gave up, if only for now, and made the repo private. Happy for anyone to fork it and do what they want. Maybe if it didn’t have the name Metropolis, Hoefler would be less of an a$$ about it.
I know this happened months back, and this recently I just found out about it. But I would like to ask about it for the sake of using Clarity City and/or Metropolis for web and mobile development, probably both for personal and commercial use.
The Github repo for Metropolis was made private by the author himself and is thus inaccessible. Just to clarify, what just happened? Is it because of the name “Metropolis” having in conflict with Monotype’s use of the name “Metropolis”?
Does that mean I cannot and should not use Metropolis for commercial purposes and it is not legal? (Would I now have legal problems using Metropolis?)
What about the Clarity City by VMware being based on Metropolis? Can I then use it for commercial and personal use without problems associated with Metropolis’ author and Monotype?
Thank you in advance for your or anyone’s as quick as possible response.
Justin, you certainly can use the open source release of ‘‘Clarity City’’, consistent with its OFL license, from GitHub, just like the company VMware does.
You can also use the ‘‘Metropolis’’ release, consistent with its OFL license, at FontsArena.com, just like the Mozilla Foundation does.