I am writing regarding my add-on, which was disabled due to a violation of Firefox’s policies. I fully acknowledge the issue and have taken steps to correct the problems in the updated version.
At present, the Developer Hub does not show me the option to upload a new version while the add-on remains disabled. I would like to request your guidance on how I can proceed with submitting the corrected version for review so that the add-on can be re-enabled.
I am committed to ensuring that the add-on complies with all Firefox policies and guidelines going forward. Please let me know the necessary steps or requirements to restore the add-on and allow me to upload the updated version.
Hey @Ayush_Rana. It’s hard to say what’s going on with you add-on without more information. Can you share the message you received from AMO or the add-on’s ID?
Hello,
Your Extension YT Bookmarker was manually reviewed by the Mozilla Add-ons team in an assessment performed on our own initiative of content that was submitted to Mozilla Add-ons.
Our review found that your content violates the following Mozilla policy or policies:
This add-on violates Mozilla’s add-on policies by collecting ancillary user data..
Affected versions: 2.1.2, 2.1.3
Based on that finding, those versions of your Extension have been disabled on https://addons.mozilla.org/developers/addon/2876798/versions and are no longer available for download from Mozilla Add-ons, anywhere in the world. In addition, in some cases, users who have previously installed those versions won’t be able to continue using them.
More information about Mozilla’s add-on policies can be found at https://extensionworkshop.com/documentation/publish/add-on-policies/.
If you believe that you did not violate Mozilla’s policies, or that this decision was otherwise made in error, you have the right to appeal this decision within 6 months from the date of this email. See REDACTED for details on the appeal process, including how to file an appeal for this specific decision. You may also choose to have this decision reviewed by a third party neutral arbiter, or to seek judicial redress in a court of law.
Thank you for your attention.
EDIT by @dotproto: Removed the appeal link to prevent others from filing appeal rejections.
If you haven’t already, you should file an appeal. I’d recommend including the information you provided in your original post here in the appeal’s description. Depending on the outcome of that appeal, you may be allowed to submit a new version for review.